For those of us who enjoyed the work of Jack Kirby during Marvel's Silver Age, it was certainly perplexing to see him return to Marvel in 1976 only to disavow most of the heroes in the Marvel "universe" and instead strike a deal to create, write, and pencil his own projects--though something we can hardly blame the man for, considering the circumstances of his earlier departure. Yet he would make an exception for two of Marvel's mainstream characters, Captain America and the Black Panther, each of which he apparently had his own ideas on how their worlds and their personalities would be structured.
For Captain America in particular, who under Stan Lee and other writers had become ingrained in stories in both Tales Of Suspense and The Avengers since the '60s, the transition to Kirby's handling of the character took some getting used to, assuming there were any readers who managed to do so. That would hold true for other characters, as well, in certain respects. Kirby had decided to retain Sam Wilson, the Falcon, though inexplicably choosing to sever any ties the Falcon had to his own falcon, Redwing--and Leila Taylor was kept on as well, yet a shadow of her former radical leanings and forthrightness whose time with Sam had apparently tempered her. The only other mainstay Marvel figures to be featured in the book (aside from villains such as Magneto, the Red Skull, et al.) were agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., though with no mention of Nick Fury, the helicarrier, or any other recognizable facets of the organization aside from special weaponry.
As an example of the dichotomy here, let's take a pair of issues from both The Avengers and Captain America which were published in December of 1976 to January of 1977. Captain America continues to thrive in the Avengers, who at this point in time are not only dealing with the return of Wonder Man from the dead, but also fighting with Attuma and Tyrak--allies involved in a two-pronged attack to conscript the Avengers into battling the Sub-Mariner, which forces the team to mount an assault on Hydrobase but instead brings them into conflict with Dr. Doom. Both issues feature cover art by Jack Kirby (who, curiously enough, provided a number of covers for Marvel characters across the board) and indicate a familiarity with the plots and the characters involved.
But over in the Captain America title, where Cap's status as an Avenger has never to my knowledge been alluded to, Cap and the Falcon are isolated in their own world of the bizarre and the monstrous, and any heavy lifting is handled by either SHIELD or the military--with Steve Rogers still acting much like a man from the 1940s, having apparently experienced no personal growth in character which would have resulted from the many adventures he's been through since being revived by the Avengers. The story's threat? Why, a cadaver infused with an energy form which has travelled back from the distant future, of course.
Captain America meets "Agron" following a visit with Dr. Hartman, who works in SHIELD's psychiatric division and is currently treating the Falcon and Leila, who have fallen under the sway of the mentally unstable Night People.
Cap, no stranger to the incredible, nevertheless responds to Hartman's words in the only way he's allowed to by the one who scripts him: "You can't be serious, Doc! It's just too fantastic!" Get a grip, Cap--you've encountered (and, for that matter, undergone) time travel yourself, or doesn't your writer recall a fellow named Kang?
One other thing that Kirby has retained is Steve Rogers' personal relationship with Sharon Carter, a former SHIELD agent who would like nothing better than for Steve to retire from being Captain America. To Kirby's credit, the scene acknowledges that Cap feels he plays a special role in terms of standing up for the average person, the "little guys" as he puts it--though it also digs in and takes the stance that those people will be virtually abandoned if Cap steps down. "Who watches the fort? Who helps the good guys?" How did the average person ever get along without you while you were in hibernation, Cap?
As for Hartman, whose patient we know is going to become a threat, he has reason to believe he's going to need backup. Yet if you had the resources of the Supreme Headquarters, International Espionage and Law-Enforcement Division at your disposal, and you needed to pick up the phone for help in handling a character that presented an imminent danger, who would you call? SHIELD, or a costumed hero who has the temerity to say no to your request and has the good sense to recommend you call in your own people who are more suited to handle it?
As Hartman feared, Agron makes his move, and officers posted in the facility have no success containing him with conventional weaponry. But Hartman still wants a super-hero to deal with the threat--and so he resorts to... no, not the Avengers (remember what book you're reading), even though one call from SHIELD is enough to get them to assemble on the double... instead, he drafts the Falcon, still loyal to his brothers in the Night People but willing to act to defend them from Agron. He doesn't get far in that respect--and the "headway" he makes isn't the kind he might have had in mind.
Finally, a SHIELD officer in contact with Hartman has scrambled a SHIELD swat team to confront the threat--but the further analysis his office has conducted has more to offer on the origin of Agron.
Finally, a SHIELD transmission of the highest priority rouses Cap from his brooding on his situation with Carol (certainly Kirby meant to write "Sharon" in the panel--the chaos created by Agron must have frazzled even the King), and he races to the site where Agron is rampaging through the streets. The reader must be curious by now as to what agility and hand-to-hand combat can accomplish against Agron, and the scenes which Kirby provides bear that out; but throughout this series, Kirby has done a fair job of presenting Cap and the Falcon as a team, and it's teamwork (and a little SHIELD research) that saves the day.
As we've seen, Kirby usually sticks with the uncomplicated and all-too-familiar action! action! action! formula as a tried-and-true method from years gone by* that gives comics readers what he believes they really want. One isn't given a moment to wonder why Agron would need a body in the first place if his energy form is capable of attack and mobility without one--or just how this tube can contain and/or neutralize the level of power that Agron has displayed against his victims. Then again, we've seen Stan Lee resort to similar methods in Fantastic Four #72 and no doubt many other tales, and Golden Age comics are replete with such storytelling.
*You may prefer the Tom Scott version if you're into his brand of jazz/rap.
9 comments:
"action! action! action" is a lot closer to what this reader wants than the panels you showed of "brooding! brooding! brooding!"
"action" I hasten to add, is NOT synonymous with "fighting".
A week ago I read the latest issue of Thor and it was nothing but talking. The thunder god wandering from person to person to pick their brains on a concern he had. The final splash page promised that next issue will be action-packed...but knowing modern comics, I've become all too skeptical this will be so.
Certainly there are times for a quiet issue. Particularly after some major plot line of world (personal or literal) shaking proportions, the hero and reader can enjoy a little time to de-stress and kick back.
Of course, it's all down to the skill of the writer. A real craftsman can supply a "talking issue" and keep me riveted. A skilled writer of superheroes also knows how to mix action with character development.
The panel showing the distant future where the moon is about to collide with Earth is the exact opposite of what will happen - the moon is actually moving further away from Earth.
That's NOW, CJ - in the distant future, things may be different, especially if some external force is involved.
Regarding Jack's covers for Marvel in the '70s, I was never really impressed by them. Apparently it was Marie Severin who provided layout roughs and Jack more or less drew what she'd mapped out. I don't blame Marie, but Jack was noticeably in decline at the time.
I have a lotta affection for the Kirby covers of the 70's because I was pretty young. I was born in '68. They were like catnip to me.
I think that's the same reason I still dig Jack's Bi-Centennial run on Captain America, because it was my introduction to the character. And Jack too. I even had a t-shirt.
All I remember about the Bi-Centennial was that everybody seemed to be excited about it and, still being in short pants, I was too.
I think this story stands up pretty good. The imagery is pretty wild, and Agron is genuinely scary (at least to me!) There's a reanimated corpse, here. This is a horror story!
It wasn't until I became an adult that I read Englehart's previous run on the comic, (I picked up all them back issues and enjoyed them immensely) and I think it's brilliant, this is just different, is all.
I wanted to see monsters and action, dang it, and I still do sometimes!
Kirby could really paint dire yet chillingly beautiful scenes of Earth's future. He did it Thor and Black Panther, as I recall.
M.P.
MP, I remember the Bicentennial calendar being advertised in Marvel's British comics in late 1975 but I didn't know what the Bicentennial meant - however by Summer 1976 I did know as it got lots of coverage here.
All I remember is I wore that cheap Caption America T-shirt maybe twice, hoping to wear it proudly into second grade, then my mom put it in the washing machine and it shrunk down to practically nothing.
The last I saw it, she was using it as a dishrag.
Samuel Johnson was right; "patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."
The same thing happened to my brother's Hulk T-shirt.
M.P.
Well, I think we all know the moon's fate in the future--nuclear waste stored on the far side of the moon is affected by magnetic radiation and explodes in a powerful blast that sends the moon out of orbit and hurtling into space, just as some scientists theorized in the year 1999. (I don't know why proponents of nuclear energy never seem to have a plan for nuclear waste other than trucking it to storage sites that no one wants in their back yard, but maybe watching the moon one day shrink from sight will register with them.)
I agree with M.P. about this one Comicsfan.
An eyeless zombie inhabited by an energy vampire! From the future!
What more do you need to know?
I watched John Carpenter's The Thing again on tv the other day, and it doesn't tell you much about the antagonist either. Would the film benefit if we knew any details about the creature? I don't think so.
One of the things I like about Kirby is the way he leaves space for the reader's imagination. And for other comic creators too - what would most of the Marvel writers of the 70s have done if Kirby hadn't left gaps for them to fill?
His Cap was the only A-list Marvel comic of the era that didn't continually revisit old stuff.
Btw Leila Taylor is one of my favourite supporting characters - how much better would Cap's comic have been if they'd got rid the Falcon and made her the cover billed co-star instead? - so thanks for the link. Fight the power CF!
-sean
sean, you make some noteworthy points, as usual, in a very cool other-side-of-the coin fashion. Yet I might ask in response if you believe another writer (Stan Lee... Roger Stern... Roy Thomas... Ed Brubaker... pick one or insert your own) might have filled in the blanks of Kirby's tale and made it... well, again, pick one: suspenseful... thought-provoking... far less gung-ho. Were late-'70s comics readers as "gee whiz" as Kirby seems to be writing for, the type to roll up this comic to stick in their back jeans pocket and head off to a rousing game of stick ball? The Cap I'd been reading about prior to Kirby's run was someone who had made headway in finding his place in a world that had progressed twenty years from the America he remembered--holding on to his values, but open to new concepts and ideas; and the Cap who fought and grew with the Avengers wasn't someone who would dismiss a potential threat by saying that it "looks sound to me" and distill it down to someone who had read one too many science fiction tales. Kirby has a talent for storytelling, no question about that--but as the saying goes, maybe it's his presentation that needed work.
Post a Comment