Wrapping up our look at symbolic splash pages which were featured in Marvel books from the early 1960s to the mid-'70s, we come to two team books which separately may not have offered much in this area but, combined, "assemble" an interesting collection to close out this series in the PPC.
In the case of the Avengers, like myself you may find their set of symbolic splash pages rather a mixed bag in terms of creativity and quality--a far cry from Steve Ditko's offerings in Amazing Spider-Man, though, in all fairness, we're talking about apples and oranges in terms of not only the characters but how the two books were being presented to the reader. It also has to be said that, unlike Fantastic Four, which had its own share of SSPs, The Avengers and X-Men were often in a state of flux with not only their artist teams but more importantly their direction, and as a result struggled to find their footing (and their readership)--whereas the FF and Spider-Man had the benefit of stability, which perhaps helped contribute to the look of their respective SSPs. Aside from the X-Men's color-coordinated uniforms, which were consistent for much of the title's run before it went on hiatus, neither The Avengers nor X-Men in their early days generated the sense of familiarity that a symbolic splash page could take advantage of.
Some Avengers/X-Men pages which did stand out for me in certain respects were the following (and your mileage may vary):
As opposed to the Avengers, however, I can't say there's a single page from the X-Men group that I would mark as disappointing in the context of our main theme here. (You'll note that the page for X-Men #26 even takes a moment to explain what constitutes a "symbolic splash.") All were nicely presented and piqued my interest while doing a good job of nudging me to continue to the story within. (Though I had second thoughts on the X-Men page featuring Lucifer--apparently we should be feeling tense or apprehensive about that device he's hoisting over his head, but the page does little to nothing in getting us there.) But as for the Avengers, there were some exceptions for me, followed by some brief takeaways on each.
- Avengers #9: If we didn't know better, we might think that Zemo was Wonder Man with all the fanfare the character receives in the captions. Besides the Avengers, wouldn't you have assumed that the only other figure here would be the same character whose name is being announced like thunder? And doesn't Cap's dialog seem conspicuously added to avoid such confusion?
- Avengers #13: The Avengers certainly don't look like they're trapped in a castle--it's really the charge of treason that's the main draw here. For maximum effect, let the title reflect the shocking image we're looking at. The machinations of Count Nefaria, a new character we know nothing about, can wait for the story to elaborate on.
- Avengers #s 17-18: So the new Avengers lineup is already reduced to fighting a mythical monster--is that what they or we signed up for, or isn't there more to this story? As for the Commissar, as a foe for the Avengers he appears at first glance a poor substitute for the Mandarin.
- Avengers #61: Granted, it's a John Buscema two-page spread; but unlike a similar opening rendered by Gene Colan, Buscema's is a symbolic representation and isn't directly relevant to the succeeding page. With apologies to Surtur, Ymir, Mr. Buscema, and letterer Sam Rosen, we need a little more than a "fold-out" title to better represent the events we'll be reading about.
Hopefully you've enjoyed this brief series. Coming up at a later date, the PPC is already rounding up symbolic splash pages from other titles for a follow-up presentation--and if you have some examples of your own from the titles which were featured but didn't appear here, feel free to point them out. We're all ears (and eyes)!
Yep. My mileage does vary. That splash page to Avengers #11 (featuring Spider-Man) isn't good. Giant Man looks out of proportion somehow (maybe a bit too squat?) but it's the lazy webby background that takes it to another level. I've said it before nut Avengers #10 and #11 are two truly awful comics.
ReplyDeleteI'm with you on Avengers #9 (Wonder Man) though. One 9f the great WTF splash pages,
Well, thats Don Heck for you dangermash.
ReplyDeleteComicsfan, I'm afraid I have to disagree with you about Avengers #61, which had a great opening.
Its not actually a double page spread like the Gene Colan one, designed to be read as a single image, but - being on pgs 1 and 2, rather than 2 and 3 - two splashes in sequence. (At least, I hope so - if it was only like that in the reprint I read and not the original issue I'm going to sound pretty stupid)
Anyhow, two pages for just the story title really set up an epic feel imo, and made for one of the more strikingly memorable openings of the later 60s. Quite an achievement considering the competition was from Kirby, Steranko, Colan, Adams...
-sean
I have a soft spot for Ka-Zar because he appeared in my first ever Marvel comic - Marvel UK's Planet Of The Apes #5 in November 1974.
ReplyDeleteBut he's a total rip-off of Tarzan - he even steals four of the letters in Tarzan's name :D
I'm only repeating myself, but I fail to see the point of these "second covers". The real cover already convinced me to buy the comic. I don't need any follow-up enticement or sales pitch to read what my hard-earned allowance bought.
ReplyDeleteI prefer comics today using that first page for a recap of the current story arc (and the creators' credits). Some are just presented in a bold, graphic layout. Others get more creative; Spider-Man and Daredevil of the last decade both featured these recap pages done as mock-ups of a Daily Bugle front page (or news blog). The Super-Villain Team-Up mini series of Modok's Eleven had a humorous current scorecard of which of the villain characters had backstabbed or betrayed the others to form new allegiances. Agents of Atlas (sigh. I so miss that comic from ten years ago) had the info page presented by one of the characters in the team each issue. Quite entertaining, really.
Either with symbolic pages or recap pages, my final response is summed up really well by Ken hale (aka Gorilla Man): "Annnd cut! Let's make with the superheroing already!!"
Sean, that's a fair point about the Buscema pages not being a single image, which is partially why I enclosed its description as a "fold-out" title in quotes. I went back and forth on my feelings on the page--after all, it is a splendid piece of creativity to open the issue, and it virtually shouts symbolism which allows it to more than adequately meets the criteria for this type of post. I just feel that it's the lettering that does the heavy lifting here, with the beings who might have had more of a presence on these pages instead looming behind it. Is the world in danger of ending here, as the title implies? We have little to go on aside from the alarmed state of the Avengers, and two menacing-looking creatures.
ReplyDeleteColin, the "coincidence" of the letters shared by the names of both Ka-Zar and Tarzan never occurred to me!
Murray, I imagine you must have enjoyed the opening pages to The Defenders #s 123 and 125, as they reflect the sort of approach you mention.
I'm not a big fan of symbolic splash pages in principle. I'd much rather have that page contribute to the story. For years, DC would have a splash page that was basically like a second cover - drove me crazy! What a waste of a page!
ReplyDelete